NotesBolt logoNotesBolt — Exam-ready book notes
Back

Political science · An Introduction To Political Theory 9th Edition O. P. Gauba

Chapter 11 : Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation

Table of contents25 sections
  1. 1.Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation
  2. 2.[I] Theories of Unlimited Obligation
  3. 3.The Doctrine of Force Majeure
  4. 4.Divine Right Theory
  5. 5.Conservative View
  6. 6.Key Terms
  7. 7.📌 Exam Tidbits
  8. 8.[II] Theories of Limited Obligation
  9. 9.Principle of Consent
  10. 10.Moralist View
  11. 11.Idealist View
  12. 12.Key Terms
  13. 13.📌 Exam Tidbits
  14. 14.[III] Theories Against Political Obligation
  15. 15.Marxist View
  16. 16.Anarchist View
  17. 17.Key Terms
  18. 18.📌 Exam Tidbits
  19. 19.[IV] Gandhian Perspective
  20. 20.Key Terms
  21. 21.📌 Exam Tidbits
  22. 22.Conclusion
  23. 23.Key Terms
  24. 24.📌 Exam Tidbits
  25. 25.Quick-Recall Box

Chapter preview

Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation

Political obligation is a prominent issue in political philosophy concerned with how far, when, and why an individual is obliged to obey the law and the commands of political authority.

  • It encompasses duties necessary for maintaining political institutions, such as payment of taxes, political participation, voting, jury service, and military duty.
  • Political philosophy inquires into the logical and moral grounds of this obligation to determine its proper scope and limits.

[I] Theories of Unlimited Obligation

The Doctrine of Force Majeure

  • Core Premise: The superior strength of the state is the source of political obligation.
  • Mechanism: The state is so powerful that the individual has no option but to obey. Obligation is based on the fear of punishment or unpleasant consequences following disobedience.
  • View of Authority: The state/government is the embodiment of political authority, and its invincible power is the source of that authority.
  • Criticism: It lacks moral grounding. It relies on the dubious rule of 'might is right', denies the individual the right to judge if a law is right or wrong, and resembles surrender to an armed robber rather than willing obedience.

Divine Right Theory

  • Core Premise: The authority of the sovereign is derived from God; obedience to the state is as imperative as obedience to God.
  • Historical Context: Early hints exist in ancient Indian political thought. Developed in Europe during the ascendancy of monarchy. Recently upheld in pre-communist Tibet and some tribal kingdoms.
  • Major Exponent: Robert Filmer (1588–1653).
  • Implications: Establishes obligation on religious rather than moral grounds. If a King turns out to be a tyrant, people have to obey him as a punishment for their sin.
  • Example: James I of England (1566–1625) sought to justify his tyrannical rule precisely on this ground.
  • Distinction from Charismatic Authority: Some writers incorrectly equate this theory with 'charismatic authority'.
  • Charismatic authority is personal, based on mystical qualities, and vanishes with the person.
  • Divine right theory concedes the inheritance of authority, making it akin to 'traditional authority'.
  • Criticism: Denies the individual's right to exercise judgement or resist wrong commands.

Conservative View

  • Core Premise: Upholds…
This is a 350-word maximum preview. The complete chapter remains available only with the Political science plan.
Locked chapter

This chapter is part of the Political science plan

Subscribe to read every chapter on any device. Free chapters remain readable for everyone.

View plans
Chapter 12 : Concept of Law