Political science · An Introduction To Political Theory 9th Edition O. P. Gauba
Chapter 11 : Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation
Table of contents25 sections
- 1.Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation
- 2.[I] Theories of Unlimited Obligation
- 3.The Doctrine of Force Majeure
- 4.Divine Right Theory
- 5.Conservative View
- 6.Key Terms
- 7.📌 Exam Tidbits
- 8.[II] Theories of Limited Obligation
- 9.Principle of Consent
- 10.Moralist View
- 11.Idealist View
- 12.Key Terms
- 13.📌 Exam Tidbits
- 14.[III] Theories Against Political Obligation
- 15.Marxist View
- 16.Anarchist View
- 17.Key Terms
- 18.📌 Exam Tidbits
- 19.[IV] Gandhian Perspective
- 20.Key Terms
- 21.📌 Exam Tidbits
- 22.Conclusion
- 23.Key Terms
- 24.📌 Exam Tidbits
- 25.Quick-Recall Box
Chapter preview
Grounds and Limits of Political Obligation
Political obligation is a prominent issue in political philosophy concerned with how far, when, and why an individual is obliged to obey the law and the commands of political authority.
- It encompasses duties necessary for maintaining political institutions, such as payment of taxes, political participation, voting, jury service, and military duty.
- Political philosophy inquires into the logical and moral grounds of this obligation to determine its proper scope and limits.
[I] Theories of Unlimited Obligation
The Doctrine of Force Majeure
- Core Premise: The superior strength of the state is the source of political obligation.
- Mechanism: The state is so powerful that the individual has no option but to obey. Obligation is based on the fear of punishment or unpleasant consequences following disobedience.
- View of Authority: The state/government is the embodiment of political authority, and its invincible power is the source of that authority.
- Criticism: It lacks moral grounding. It relies on the dubious rule of 'might is right', denies the individual the right to judge if a law is right or wrong, and resembles surrender to an armed robber rather than willing obedience.
Divine Right Theory
- Core Premise: The authority of the sovereign is derived from God; obedience to the state is as imperative as obedience to God.
- Historical Context: Early hints exist in ancient Indian political thought. Developed in Europe during the ascendancy of monarchy. Recently upheld in pre-communist Tibet and some tribal kingdoms.
- Major Exponent: Robert Filmer (1588–1653).
- Implications: Establishes obligation on religious rather than moral grounds. If a King turns out to be a tyrant, people have to obey him as a punishment for their sin.
- Example: James I of England (1566–1625) sought to justify his tyrannical rule precisely on this ground.
- Distinction from Charismatic Authority: Some writers incorrectly equate this theory with 'charismatic authority'.
- Charismatic authority is personal, based on mystical qualities, and vanishes with the person.
- Divine right theory concedes the inheritance of authority, making it akin to 'traditional authority'.
- Criticism: Denies the individual's right to exercise judgement or resist wrong commands.
Conservative View
- Core Premise: Upholds…
This is a 350-word maximum preview. The complete chapter remains available only with the Political science plan.
Locked chapter
This chapter is part of the Political science plan
Subscribe to read every chapter on any device. Free chapters remain readable for everyone.
View plans Chapter 12 : Concept of Law